MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417334946 · doi:10.7202/1122037ar

Anarchie et architectonique du soi dans la phénoménologie de Marc Richir

2025· article· fr· W4417334946 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Istvàn Fazakas

Bibliographic record

VenueLaval théologique et philosophique · 2025
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPhilosophical and Theoretical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDomain (mathematical analysis)Context (archaeology)Representation (politics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Articuler une architectonique avec l’idée d’une genèse radicalement anarchique peut sembler être une tâche impossible. C’est pourtant bien à cette tâche que se confronte la phénoménologie richirienne. Après une analyse du problème de la genèse dans une pensée architectonique et de la genèse de l’architectonique, nous aborderons plus concrètement la question de la genèse de l’ipséité. Nous présenterons plusieurs perspectives, aboutissant à l’idée d’une genèse affective du soi. Nous montrerons ensuite comment la genèse affective du soi permet également de penser une architectonique incarnée, conduisant à l’idée d’une chair anarchique de la phénoménologie.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.880
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLaval théologique et philosophiqueSame topicPhilosophical and Theoretical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207