Predictors of Coping in Adolescence: The Influence of Temperament and Parenting Styles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Coping strategies are essential for adolescents' socio-emotional well-being and academic success. This study aims to explore the predictive role of temperament traits, parental care, and overprotection in shaping adolescents' coping strategies. A cross-sectional design was employed to collect data from 1,195 Italian adolescents aged 14-18 years. Stepwise regression analyses were conducted to identify significant predictors of coping strategies. Findings revealed that temperament traits, particularly depressive and cyclothymic temperaments, were the strongest predictors of coping strategies. High parental care perceived by adolescents promoted adaptive coping strategies such as Social Support and Problem Solving, whereas lower parental care levels perceived by adolescents were linked to Avoidance coping strategies. Temperament traits play a more prominent role than parenting in shaping adolescents' coping strategies, suggesting that interventions should focus on biological predispositions while fostering a supportive -family environment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".