MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417336880 · doi:10.1109/tase.2025.3643989

Stable Trajectory Tracking of Magnetic Swarms Under Uncertain Viscosity: An Adaptive Robust Lyapunov Redesign

2025· article· W4417336880 on OpenAlexaff
Qigao Fan, Han Xu, Yueyue Liu, Xinyu Liu, Xiaoli Luan

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMicro and Nano Robotics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Robustness (evolution)TrajectoryKinematicsLyapunov functionAdaptive controlRobust controlController (irrigation)Stability (learning theory)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Magnetic microrobotic swarms are increasingly studied for their potential in precise motion control under complex and uncertain environments. One of the core challenges in swarm-level control lies in achieving accurate trajectory tracking in the presence of time-varying dynamic parameters, such as fluid resistance. To address such problem, we incorporate error integration into the swarms control framework and derive a kinematic model through model transformation. Based on this model, a Lyapunov-based adaptive robust control strategy is developed to ensure closed-loop stability and compensate for environmental uncertainties. The proposed controller dynamically adapts to unknown environmental variations, and rigorous theoretical analysis establishes the asymptotic stability of the system. A series of experiments are conducted on an electromagnetic actuation platform using silicone oil environments with different viscosities (5 cSt, 10 cSt, and 15 cSt) as well as under a rapidly varying viscosity generated by syringe pump to validate the method. Experimental results confirm that the proposed strategy enables the microrobotic swarm to achieve stable and precise trajectory tracking under varying resistance conditions, demonstrating its robustness and adaptability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.858
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Automation Science and EngineeringSame topicMicro and Nano RoboticsFrench-language works237,207