MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Physics Inspired Neural Network for Cortical Electromagnetic Activity of Neonates

2025· article· W4417338999 on OpenAlexaff
Aleksandar Jeremić, Abdullah Biran, Aljazi A. AlMaghlouth

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal and fetal brain pathology
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial neural networkElectroencephalographyNeural activityBrain activity and meditationInversion (geology)Intensive careDuration (music)Psychological intervention

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neonatal convulsions are one of the most common emergency neurological events in the early period after birth with the frequency of 1.5 to 3 in 1000 live births. Consequently, neonatal intensive care units (NICU) continuously monitor electrical activity of preterm infants for both short-term and long-term interventions and/or treatments. These techniques commonly utilize only detection algorithms whose main purpose is to detect events in electroencephalography (EEG) recordings. In addition to those, estimation techniques can potentially provide insight into the brain development and indicate regions of higher convulsion rate. The estimation of electrical activity of the brain in adults has been a subject of considerable research interest in adults. To this purpose in this paper we investigate the possibility of estimating the cortical activity of the neonates using physics informed neural networks. The main idea behind this approach lies in the possibility of significantly reducing the computational intensity of the inverse approach by avoiding the need for inversion using artificial neural networks (ANN).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNeonatal and fetal brain pathology→French-language works237,207→