MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Rethinking the role of cartilage loss: the influence of intra- and extra-articular factors on symptoms in advanced knee osteoarthritis

2025· article· en· W4417343745 on OpenAlex
Luca Bianco Prevot, Alessandro Bensa, Pietro Randelli, Giuseppe Filardo

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueBone & Joint Open · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOsteoarthritisDegeneration (medical)CartilageKnee painKnee cartilageKnee JointPatella

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aims: Understanding the factors contributing to pain and function limitation in knee osteoarthritis (OA) is crucial to optimize the individual patient's management. This study aimed to quantify the role of cartilage degeneration, as well as other intra- and extra-articular factors, in determining clinical symptoms in patients with advanced knee OA. Methods: Subjects were selected from the Osteoarthritis Initiative database based on the criteria: Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grades 3 to 4 and baseline clinical and MRI data. The analyzed data were: demographic parameters, KL grade, subchondral bone without cartilage coverage, anterior knee pain due to patellar quadriceps tendinitis, effusion, anserine bursa tenderness, meniscal extrusion, Hoffa's inflammation, bone marrow lesions (BMLs), visual analogue scale for pain, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) total score, and WOMAC pain subscale. Results: The multivariate analysis on 233 knees demonstrated that VAS was influenced by the percentage of femoral subchondral bone without cartilage coverage (p < 0.001/η² = 0.058), patellar quadriceps tendinitis (p = 0.004/η² = 0.036), BMI (p = 0.013/η² = 0.027), age (p = 0.026/η² = 0.022), and anserine bursa tenderness (p = 0.033/η² = 0.020). However, the WOMAC total score was influenced by patellar quadriceps tendinitis (p < 0.001/η² = 0.114), BMI (p = 0.001/η² = 0.045), female sex (p = 0.016/η² = 0.025), and medial compartment BMLs (p = 0.015/η² = 0.029), but not by the extent of cartilage damage. Conclusion: The extent of cartilage degeneration influences the pain level, but is not the main factor driving the overall symptoms experienced in advanced knee OA. Other intra- and extra-articular factors, including patellar quadriceps tendinitis, anserine bursa tenderness, BMLs, and BMI have a greater impact on pain and functional impairment, and should be considered when choosing the most suitable treatment approach to manage knee OA patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.191
Threshold uncertainty score0.383

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it