MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417349881 · doi:10.3389/fneur.2025.1649224

Arterial spin labeling-ASPECTS and a conventional MRI-based nomogram for predicting prognosis after surgical revascularization in Moyamoya disease

2025· article· en· W4417349881 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tao Yuan, Zhenhua Xu, Yawu Liu, Lijuan Gao, Lei Lou, Lina Geng, Haiying Cui, Guanmin Quan

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Neurology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMoyamoya disease diagnosis and treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNomogramMoyamoya diseaseSurgical proceduresRevascularizationMagnetic resonance imagingSurgical planningArterial spin labeling

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective This study aimed to explore the significant factors of prognosis in patients with Moyamoya disease (MMD) after surgical revascularization and to develop a nomogram model for predicting poor prognosis. Materials and methods We retrospectively analyzed magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and clinical data of 128 patients with MMD. The patients were randomly assigned to training and validation cohorts in a ratio of 7:3. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was applied to identify factors significantly associated with prognosis. The predictive efficiencies of the models were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and compared using the Delong test. We then developed a nomogram model for prediction and verified it using a validation cohort. Results Preoperative arterial spin labeling (ASL)-Alberta Stroke Program Early computed tomography Score (ASL-ASPECTS), admission modified Rankin scale (mRS) score, ivy sign, and Houkin’s grade >2 were significantly associated with poor prognosis (mRS > 2). The areas under the curves (AUCs) for predicting poor prognosis were 0.772, 0.855, 0.899, and 0.994 for clinical, conventional MRI, ASL-based, and combination models, respectively. The results of the Delong test demonstrated the superior prediction ability of the combination model compared with the clinical, conventional MRI, and ASL models (all p < 0.001). Calibration curve analysis showed that the predictive probability of the nomogram model was highly consistent in the training cohort. The decision curve showed a net predictive benefit in the validation cohort. Conclusion Preoperative ASL-ASPECTS, admission mRS, ivy sign, and Houkin grade >2 were significantly associated with poor prognosis in patients with MMD after surgical revascularization. The nomogram model, including enrolled ASL-ASPECTS and MRI features, may help improve prognosis prediction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in NeurologySame topicMoyamoya disease diagnosis and treatmentFrench-language works237,207