MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417351162 · doi:10.1007/s41748-025-00913-7

High-Resolution Mapping of Soil Organic Carbon Stocks Using Machine and Deep Learning Approaches Across Mediterranean Land Uses

2025· article· en· W4417351162 on OpenAlexaff
Mounir Oukhattar, Sébastien Gadal, Yannick Robert, Ismaguil Hanadé Houmma, Nicolas Saby, Catherine Keller

Bibliographic record

VenueEarth Systems and Environment · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil Geostatistics and Mapping
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMediterranean climateDeep learningSoil carbonLand useTotal organic carbonSoil organic matterDeep blue

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Soils play crucial role as reservoir of organic carbon, reflecting the quality and fertility of terrestrial ecosystems. Consequently, understanding the spatial distribution of soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks and the factors that influence these distributions is imperative for ensuring environmental sustainability and achieving carbon neutrality. This study compares four algorithms namely, Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), Deep Neural Network (DNN), and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), which use 29 environmental covariates and 442 soil samples from various land use types to predict and map SOC stocks at a depth of 0–30 cm in the Aix-Marseille-Provence (AMP) Metropolis, France. The results revealed that forests presented the highest SOC content (57 g·kg⁻1) and stock (7.5 kg·m⁻2), while vineyards displayed the lowest values (SOC content: 8.9 g·kg⁻1; stock: 3.4 kg·m⁻2). Urban areas exhibited significant SOC levels, influenced by human activity, with an average content of 45.6 g·kg⁻1 and a stock of 6.2 kg·m⁻2. The Shapley values method revealed that precipitation, elevation, land cover, vegetation index, and temperature were the major factors contributing to the prediction of the SOC stock. The SOC stock prediction algorithms revealed that the RF outperformed the other algorithms (R2 = 0.83, RMSE = 1.41 kg·m⁻2, MAE = 0.97 kg·m⁻2). The area of applicability (AOA) function demonstrated that the RF model was reliable, as almost all the predicted areas fell within the AOA. These results could lead to the development of guidelines for facilitating the sustainable management of carbon sequestration in various land use types within the AMP Metropolis and other Mediterranean regions. This study represents a pioneering effort in the development of advanced artificial intelligence approaches for the high-resolution (10 m) prediction and mapping of soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks in a Mediterranean area: the Aix-Marseille-Provence (AMP) Metropolis in France. It compares the performance of four predictive algorithms — Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), Deep Neural Network (DNN), and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) using 29 environmental covariates derived from climatic, topographic, land use, remote sensing, human footprint, physicochemical soil parameters, and geological data. The analysis is based on 442 soil samples from fifteen different land use types, collected from historical archives and recent field campaigns. Initially, we analysed the variation in SOC content and stock according to land use type to understand how different management practices and ecosystems influence carbon storage a particularly critical issue in the Mediterranean context, such as that of the AMP Metropolis, which is highly sensitive to the effects of climate change and anthropogenic pressures. This step is essential for identifying land use types with high carbon sequestration potential and for assessing the impact of land use changes. The analysis revealed that forests presented the highest SOC contents and stocks, while vineyards presented the lowest values. The study also reveals that the RF model outperforms the other models in terms of prediction accuracy and quality of SOC stock mapping. Based on the results of the RF model, the Shapley Values method was applied to identify the main factors contributing to SOC stock prediction, namely, precipitation, altitude, land cover, vegetation index, and temperature. The Area of Applicability (AOA) method was subsequently used to determine the zones where the model’s predictions are considered reliable. These findings provide valuable decision-support tools, offering essential information for sustainable soil management and the development of carbon sequestration strategies tailored to Mediterranean environments. Forests had the highest soil organic carbon (SOC) stock; vineyards had the lowest. Urban area showed notable SOC stocks due to human influence. High-resolution SOC stock prediction and mapping were conducted using sad-vanced artificial intelligence algorithms in a Mediterranean Metropolis. Among the developed algorithms in this study, Random Forest (RF) algorithms demonstrated the best performance in predicting SOC stock (R2 = 0.83). Precipitation, elevation, land cover, vegetation index, and temperature were identi-fied as key predictors of SOC stock using Shapley value. The “Area of Applicability” approach validated the reliability of the RF model, as nearly all the predicted areas fell within the applicable domain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueEarth Systems and EnvironmentSame topicSoil Geostatistics and MappingFrench-language works237,207