MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Playing the Field(s) of Mathematics Education

2010· book-chapter· en· W4417352922 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kathleen Nolan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScholarshipConstructivism (international relations)Variety (cybernetics)Teacher educationFocus (optics)Teaching methodReform mathematicsPhilosophy of mathematics education

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There is promising research on how inquiry-based classroom discourse in mathematics leads to enhanced student engagement and conceptual understanding (Walshaw & Anthony, 2008). While the notion of an inquiry-based classroom (what it looks and feels like) is interpreted in diverse ways across a variety of contexts, there are a few distinguishing features common to most. In general, inquiry-based pedagogy is an alternative view of teaching and learning, based primarily on theories of constructivism and characterized by classrooms where the focus is on constructing mathematical understanding through student investigation, collaboration, and communication (Cheeseman, 2008; Leikin & Rota, 2006). In university teacher education, however, mathematics educators struggle in their work with prospective teachers to help bring about a shift from traditional teacher-directed approaches to such inquiry-based classroom discourses (Makar, 2007; Manouchehri, 1998; Wilson, Cooney, & Stinson, 2005). This is due, in part, to the fact that the paradigm shift to inquiry-based classrooms also demands a tolerance for ambiguity, uncertainty, and negotiation—skills not generally acquired through years of traditional school mathematics experiences. Thus, mathematics teacher educators are confronted with numerous challenges and complexities as they work to inspire prospective teachers to embrace inquiry-based pedagogies, while also seeking to deconstruct what are perceived as firmly entrenched stereotypes and ideas about teaching (Weber & Mitchell, 1995). My current scholarship as a mathematics teacher educator and researcher involves introducing prospective middle years teachers to alternative, inquirybased pedagogy in mathematics. In recent research (Nolan, 2006), I proposed the existence of several classroom discourses that act to regulate the teaching and learning of mathematics, with the discourses often being in direct opposition to reform recommendations to effect change in mathematics classrooms. As Brown (2008) suggests, such regulative discourses can act as “cover stories” for why theories of alternative forms of pedagogy are not having a noticeable impact on classroom practice and new teacher development. At issue, of course, is the prospective teachers’ own lack of experience as students with alternatives to traditional teacher-directed approaches in teaching and learning mathematics. Mathematics reform and teacher education initiatives must begin by acknowledging that the first step to changing the way prospective teachers teach is to change the way prospective teachers learn (Pereira, 2005). In other words, “unless teachers directly experience inquiry learning for themselves it is quite unlikely that they will be able to implement it in their classroom” (Carter & Richards, 1999, p. 70). In addition, I would argue that when prospective teachers have positive and self-affirming experiences with learning mathematics through alternative, inquiry-based pedagogy, they are less inclined to resist the traditional, familiar (and regulating) discourses of what it means to teach and to “cover” mathematics content. The belief that prospective teachers require experience learning through (not merely about) inquiry-based pedagogy led me to design and teach a new course in a university undergraduate teacher education program. The course, entitled Curricular Topics in Mathematics, is a compulsory course taken by prospective middle years teachers in their second year of a four-year teacher education degree at a Canadian university. In the design of the course, I selected the content to focus on middle years and secondary school topics in geometry and statistics, while the pedagogy included a variety of inquiry-based approaches, such as mathematical investigations, problem-based learning, technology-integrated learning modules, and collaborative problem posing/ solving. The discussions in this chapter are based on data from a research project designed as a self-study narrative of my experience teaching this new course, using my own journal reflections (as the designer and instructor for the course), as well as the journal writings and assignments of the students enrolled in the course. In addition to journals, data included student autobiographical “inventory” (survey) responses and final course evaluations. In this chapter, I present a reflexive narrative on my experience teaching this course, constructed through my own lens as a teacher (acknowledging my vulnerability in the face of student resistance and dissatisfaction) and through the lens of identifying with new teachers as they face similar student and classroom discourses of resistance. What makes this story unique is its candid approach to exploring why current mathematics teacher education programs generally have a superficial and temporary impact on reforming the teaching and learning of school mathematics. The story, told from my perspective as a mathematics teacher educator, highlights the need for a reconceptualized mathematics teacher education program that embraces the dynamic relationship between research, teaching, and learning. Encouraging prospective mathematics teachers to make personal and professional transitions from traditional didactic teaching practices to inquirybased approaches presents many challenges. While there has been valuable research to date on the nature of the transitions required for becoming teachers (Garcia, Sanchez, Escudero, & Llinares, 2006; Jaworski & Gellert, 2003; Klein, 2004; Ritchie & Wilson, 2000), the area is still relatively under-documented and under-explored in the research literature. In this chapter, I claim that the transitions of prospective teachers call for a drastic change of script in storylines for what it means to teach and learn mathematics. I propose that one way to understand and unpack the transitions is using Bourdieu’s social field theory. In the following pages, I draw on aspects of Bourdieu’s theory to explore the pedagogical and paradoxical possibilities of inquiry-based pedagogy in mathematics (teacher) education.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.126

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0380.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.341 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMathematics Education and Teaching TechniquesFrench-language works237,207