MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417362031 · doi:10.1002/trc2.70185

The interaction effect of physical activity and sleep on cognitive function in stroke

2025· article· en· W4417362031 on OpenAlexafffund
Ryan G Stein, Ryan S. Falck, Rachel A. Crockett, Jennifer C. Davis, Ging‐Yuek Robin Hsiung, Janice J. Eng, Laura E. Middleton, Peter A. Hall, Teresa Liu‐Ambrose

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia Translational Research & Clinical Interventions · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSleep and related disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooOkanagan University CollegeVancouver Coastal HealthUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusVancouver Coastal Health Research InstituteUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchFondation pour la Recherche sur Alzheimer
KeywordsSleep (system call)CognitionPhysical activityActigraphyAssociation (psychology)Stroke (engine)Effects of sleep deprivation on cognitive performanceCardiovascular health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract INTRODUCTION Having a stroke increases risk for dementia two‐fold. Poor sleep quality and quantity are common after a stroke and are associated with cognitive impairment. Physical activity benefits cognitive function. Whether there is an interaction effect of physical activity and sleep on cognitive function among persons living with chronic stroke is unknown. METHODS A cross‐sectional study used baseline data acquired from 97 community‐dwelling adults aged ≥55 years, living with chronic stroke (71±9 years; n = 38, female), and enrolled in a 6‐month randomized controlled trial. We measured physical activity (i.e., moderate to vigorous physical activity [MVPA] and light physical activity [PA]) and sleep quality and quantity (i.e., efficiency, latency, duration) using wrist‐worn accelerometry. Global cognitive function was measured with the 13‐item Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale–Cognitive Subscale (ADAS‐Cog‐13). We assessed whether the interaction of physical activity (MVPA and light PA) with sleep quality and quantity (interaction term: physical activity * sleep) was associated with ADAS‐Cog‐13 score: (1) in the full sample and (2) among males and females separately (i.e., sex‐stratified). Significant moderations were plotted as continuous simple slopes. RESULTS In the full sample, there was a significant interaction effect between MVPA and sleep duration on the ADAS‐COG‐13 score (ß = 1.636 ± 0.787; p = 0.041). Specifically, among individuals with shorter sleep duration (i.e., one standard deviation below mean sleep duration), those with greater MVPA had better ADAS‐Cog‐13 performance. In the sex‐stratified analysis, the interaction effect of MVPA and sleep duration on cognitive function was significant in males (ß = 3.417 ± 1.374; p = 0.016) but not females. DISCUSSION Moderate to vigerous physical activity may mitigate the negative impact of shorter sleep on cognitive function among persons living with stroke, particularly males. Highlights Physical activity and sleep are associated with cognitive function following stroke. Physical activity may ameliorate the negative effects of poor sleep on cognitive function. Females suffer greater health consequences of sleep dysregulation than males. Physical activity moderates the association of sleep duration and cognitive function. Physical activity may promote cognitive function in males with short sleep duration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.152
GPT teacher head0.527
Teacher spread0.376 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia Translational Research & Clinical InterventionsSame topicSleep and related disordersFrench-language works237,207