MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417362919 · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-30131-0

Correction: Relaxation of selective constraint on the sweet-taste receptor gene TAS1R2 in lorisiform primates

2025· erratum· en· W4417362919 on OpenAlexaff
Qing Ji, Min Hou, Muhammad Shoaib Akhtar, Takashi Hayakawa, Yasuka Toda, Akihiro Itoigawa, Hiroo Imai, Takafumi Ishida, Amanda Melin, Shoji Kawamura

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Reports · 2025
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicBiochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
Canadian institutionsAlberta Children's HospitalUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConstraint (computer-aided design)Relaxation (psychology)GeneReceptorGenome

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The original version of this Article contained errors, where data in Figure 1 was incorrect. The label Strepsirrhini was drawn to encompass Lemuriformes and only a portion of Lorisiformes. In order to reflect the text accurately, the label Strepsirrhini should have fully encompassed both infraorders Lemuriformes and Lorisiformes. In addition, the species name ‘Northern lesser galago’ was incorrectly written as ‘Lesser galago.’

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.043
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.135

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.043
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0040.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0400.024

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific ReportsSame topicBiochemical Analysis and Sensing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207