MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417400357 · doi:10.56588/iabcd.v3i2.204

A REVIEW ON VEGETATION DIVERSITY OF INDIA

2024· article· W4417400357 on OpenAlexaff
Aanal Maitreya, Nainesh Modi

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Association of Biologicals and Computational Digest · 2024
Typearticle
Language
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicPharmacology and Nanomedicine Research
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEvergreenVegetation (pathology)DeciduousEvergreen forestDiversity (politics)Species diversityVegetation typesVegetation type

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Diversity of vegetation are collections of plant species and ground cover. India has the richest diversity in the records. India has a diverse and abundant vegetation with their endowed and gorgeous growth with 80.9 million hectares of forest cover. India has 24.62 % total geographic area of forest. In this review paper we have discussed that different regions have their specific vegetational localities. In this paper, there are findings of different materials and methods that are used to study vegetation such as, remote sensing & GIS. India is blessed with different types of vegetation diversity like evergreen forest, thorny forest, tropical evergreen forest, dry deciduous forest etc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.296
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.101
GPT teacher head0.459
Teacher spread0.358 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Association of Biologicals and Computational DigestSame topicPharmacology and Nanomedicine ResearchFrench-language works237,207