Trends in Liver Transplantation for Acute Liver Failure in a Spanish Multicenter Cohort
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background and Aims: Acute liver failure (ALF) is a rare and severe condition with high mortality. Liver transplantation (LT) has improved patient outcomes. This study analysed trends in aetiology, characteristics, and outcomes of ALF patients undergoing LT in Spain. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 217 adult ALF-LT cases from 11 Spanish centers (2001 -2020), divided into two 10-year periods. Clinical, biochemical, and outcome data were collected, and predictors of mortality were identified. Results: 217 adult ALF-LT patients were included (61.8% women, mean age: 41 years). Common aetiologies were cryptogenic (26.7%), autoimmune (26.3%), and viral (18%), with sex differences. Over time, autoimmune and drug-induced liver injury increased (22.3% vs 29.8% and 13.6% vs 21.1%), with a low prevalence of acetaminophen toxicity, and hepatitis B virus declined (23.3% vs 11.4%). Despite higher infection rates (52.5% vs 66.2%) linked to stronger immunosuppression, respiratory failure (29.1% vs 16.1%), chronic kidney disease (27.1% vs 13.6%), cardiovascular events (10.6% vs 1%), and mortality (37.6% vs 17.9%) decreased. Pre-LT hypertension, pre-LT acute kidney injury, and hypernatremia at LT were independently associated with worse survival. This large multicenter study revealed temporal changes in aetiologies, immunosuppressive treatment, and post-LT complications, with an improvement in outcome.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".