MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417405732 · doi:10.1080/09515089.2025.2601717

From flow to mystical experiences: Connecting entropy and fluency along the unifying framework of cognitive continuum

2025· article· en· W4417405732 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhilosophical Psychology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicFlow Experience in Various Fields
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersFundação BialSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungHeffter Research Institute
KeywordsCognitionEntropy (arrow of time)FluencyMysticismFlow (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Self-transcendent experiences (STEs) represent profound shifts in cognition and consciousness, possessing significant transformative potential. With growing scientific interest in these phenomena, we propose the cognitive continuum as a unifying framework. Grounded in enactive cognitive science and complex dynamic systems perspectives, this approach takes the embodied person, embedded within their world, as the appropriate unit of analysis. The continuum illustrates how STEs, such as flow states and mystical experiences, reflect an enhancement of relevance realization, the organism’s active engagement with its environment to adaptively frame its world, across increasingly global levels of cognitive organization. We identify destabilization and complexification as central processes in this enhancement and propose entropy as their metric. We introduce the Entropy-Fluency hypothesis, which posits that increased entropy signals destabilization followed by increased fluency, thereby conceptually bridging first-person subjective experiences with third-person scientific observations of STEs. The cognitive continuum reveals STEs as dynamic, person-specific, and context-dependent phenomena emerging from person-world coupling, requiring idiographic and transdisciplinary methodological approaches. This framework provides conceptual tools for understanding these profound experiences, contributing to a comprehensive science of human flourishing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.247
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.354 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it