MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4417405863 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202557304

Sibling sub-Neptunes around sibling M dwarfs: TOI-521 and TOI-912

2025· article· en· W4417405863 on OpenAlexaff
G. Lacedelli, E. Pallé, Kai Ikuta, H. M. Tabernero, M. R. Zapatero Osorio, J. M. Almenara, F. J. Pozuelos, Dawid Jankowski, N. Narita, Akihiko Fukui, G. Nowak, T. Hirano, Hiroyuki Ishikawa, Tadahiro Kimura, Yasunori Hori, K.A. Collins, S.B. Howell, F. Murgas, H.P. Osborn, N. Astudillo-Defru, X. Bonfils, D. Charbonneau, M. Fausnaugh, S. Geraldía-González, Krzysztof Goździewski, P. Guerra, K. W. Hodapp, K. Horne, Keisuke Isogai, Marziye Jafariyazani, Taiki Kagetani, Yuki Kawai, K. Kawauchi, Vigneshwaran Krishnamurthy, Takayuki Kotani, Tomoyuki Kudo, M. Kuzuhara, M. Mori, Jun Nishikawa, Stevanus K. Nugroho, Masashi Omiya, R.P. Schwarz, R. Sefako, A. Shporer, Gregor Srdoč, Huan-Yu Teng, Noboru Watanabe

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstro and Planetary Science
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlanetExoplanetPopulationDegeneracy (biology)RADIUSPlanetary systemRadial velocityStars

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Context . Sub-Neptunes are absent in the Solar System, yet they are the most common category of planets found in our Galaxy. This kind of planet challenges the internal structure models, prompts investigations into its formation and evolution, and pushes atmospheric characterisation studies to break the degeneracy in their inner composition. Aims . We report here the discovery and characterisation of new sub-Neptunes orbiting two similar M dwarfs, TOI-521 ( T eff = 3544 ± 100 K, V = 14.7 mag) and TOI-912 ( T eff = 3572 ± 100 K, V = 12.7 mag). Each star hosts a transiting planetary candidate identified by TESS and is part of the THIRSTEE follow-up programme, which aims to understand the sub-Neptune population through in-depth and precise characterisation studies on a population level. Methods . We analysed TESS light curves, ground-based photometry, and high-precision ESPRESSO, HARPS, and IRD radial velocities to confirm the planetary nature of both candidates, infer the precise orbital and physical parameters of the planets, and investigate the presence of additional planets in the systems. Results . The two stars host nearly identical planets in terms of mass and radius. TOI-521 hosts a transiting sub-Neptune in a 1.5-day orbit with radius and mass of R b = 1.98 ± 0.14 R ⊕ and M b = 5.3 ± 1.0 M ⊕ , respectively. Moreover, we identified an additional candidate at 20.3 days, with a minimum mass of M p sin i = 10.7 −2.4 +2.5 M ⊕ , currently not detected as transiting in our photometric dataset. Similarly, the planet orbiting TOI-912 is a 4.7-d sub-Neptune with R b = 1.93 ± 0.13 R ⊕ and M b = 5.1 ± 0.5 M ⊕ . Interestingly, TOI-912 b likely possesses an unusually high eccentricity ( e = 0.58 ± 0.02) and is probably undergoing strong tidal dissipation. If such eccentricity were confirmed, it would make TOI-912 b one of the most eccentric sub-Neptunes known to date. TOI-521 b and TOI-912 b have very similar densities (~4 g cm −3 ), and they lie in the degenerate region of the mass-radius diagram where different compositions are plausible, including a volatile-rich composition, or a rocky core surrounded by a H-He envelope. When compared to the other THIRSTEE M-dwarf targets, our sample supports the division of sub-Neptunes into two distinct populations divided by a density gap. Both planets are interesting targets for atmospheric follow-up in the context of understanding the temperature-atmospheric feature trend that starts to emerge thanks to JWST observations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and Astrophysics→Same topicAstro and Planetary Science→French-language works237,207→