MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417411625 · doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.5c09770

Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithms for Microbial Electromethanogenesis: A Comprehensive Assessment with SHapley Additive exPlanation-Based Insights

2025· article· en· W4417411625 on OpenAlexaff
Siddharth Gadkari, Raphael Souza de Oliveira, Silvia Bolognesi, Sebastià Puig, Erick Giovani Sperandio Nascimento

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMicrobial Fuel Cells and Bioremediation
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)Centre for Global Health Research
FundersDepartament d'Universitats, Recerca i Societat de la InformacióAgència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de RecercaMinisterio de Ciencia y TecnologíaNatural Environment Research CouncilConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoInstitució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis AvançatsUniversitat de Girona
KeywordsHyperparameterBoosting (machine learning)Multilayer perceptronGradient boostingArtificial neural networkInterpretabilityWorkflowConvolutional neural networkProcess (computing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Microbial electromethanogenesis (EM) presents a promising pathway for sustainable biogas upgrading, but accurately predicting its performance is challenging due to complex, nonlinear process dynamics. Here, we systematically compared seven supervised machine learning (ML) algorithms, including one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1D-CNN), multilayer perceptron (MLP), gradient boosting regressor (GBR), adaptive boosting regressor (AdaBoost), stacking regressors, and K-nearest neighbors (kNN), for their predictive biomethane production capabilities using experimental data from EM bioelectrochemical systems (EM-BESs). The data set encompassed operational parameters such as optical density (OD 600 ), pH, electrical conductivity (EC, mS/cm), average applied current (A m –2 ), and CO 2 availability (mol). After hyperparameter optimization, the 1D-CNN model exhibited superior predictive performance ( R 2 = 0.934), significantly outperforming traditional ML methods. To move beyond prediction and uncover mechanistic insights, a feature importance analysis was conducted on the CNN model using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). The analysis revealed that average current, OD 600, and pH were the most influential features in biomethane production, confirming that the model learned relationships grounded in fundamental bioelectrochemical principles. The SHAP analysis also identified complex, nonmonotonic effects of other variables, providing deeper process understanding. This study not only demonstrates the promising ability of ML, especially deep learning architectures, to advance EM optimization but also provides mechanistic insights into the factors governing bioelectrochemical methanogenesis. These findings are broadly applicable to analogous BESs, particularly microbial electrosynthesis (i.e., commodity chemical) and microbial electrolysis cells (i.e., biohydrogen), offering potential for enhancing system performance through data-driven operational control across sustainable biotechnology applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.111
Threshold uncertainty score0.954

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS Sustainable Chemistry & EngineeringSame topicMicrobial Fuel Cells and BioremediationFrench-language works237,207