Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Annika Klintefelt (Statistics Denmark, Chair of the Task Force); Julien Bérard-Chagnon, Geneviève Ouellet and Jean-François Simard (Statistics Canada); Marie Clerc and Olivier Haag (INSEE, France); Sheelagh Bonham and Tim Linehan (CSO, Ireland); Donatella Zindato (Istat, Italy); Daan Zult (CBS, Netherlands); Nathaniel Matheson-Dunning and Hannes Diener (Stats New Zealand); Pawel Murawski (Statistics Poland); Liana Vologirova (Rosstat, Russian Federation); Charlie Wroth-Smith and Karina Williams (ONS, England and Wales); Vincent Mule (United States Census Bureau); Fabian Bach and Sixten Thestrup (Eurostat); Paolo Valente and Andres Vikat (UNECE); Siraj Mahmudlu and Anja Teltschik (UNICEF); Maria Isabel Cobos Hernandez (UNSD).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it