MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417419134 · doi:10.1163/15700747-bja10151

Nimi Wariboko’s The Pentecostal Hypothesis

2025· article· W4417419134 on OpenAlexaff
Wolfgang Vondey, Daniela C. Augustine, Steven M. Studebaker, Michael Austin Kamenicky, Austin M. Williams

Bibliographic record

VenuePneuma · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPentecostalism and Christianity Studies
Canadian institutionsTrinity Western UniversityWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFocus (optics)Transformation (genetics)Work (physics)Social transformation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Five scholars discuss Nimi Wariboko’s recent work The Pentecostal Hypothesis: Christ Talks, They Decide (Eugene, OR : Cascade, 2020). The focus of attention is the Christology, epistemology, and social ethics of the book. The reviewers engage constructively with the hypothesis that Pentecostal epistemology moves between sense and spirit and suggest corrective elements that contribute to the concerns of conversion, formation, and transformation of the individual and society.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.799
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePneumaSame topicPentecostalism and Christianity StudiesFrench-language works237,207