PRIJATELJSTVO U PROSVJETITELJSTVU: O PREPISCI JULIJA BAJAMONTIJA I ALBERTA FORTISA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rad se temelji na najnovijem kritičkom izdanju pisama splitskoga liječnika, skladatelja i polihistora Julija Bajamontija (Ivana Tomić Ferić, HAZU – HMD, Zagreb, 2024), u kojem se po prvi put donosi prijepise i prijevode bogate korespondencije iz nekoliko domaćih i stranih arhiva. Uzet će se u obzir samo pisma i koncepti pisama koja su međusobno razmijenili Julije Bajamonti i talijanski prirodoslovac Alberto Fortis, s namjerom da se ponudi nov uvid u njihov odnos i u uloge koje su odigrali jedan drugome u životu i radu, i potvrdi teza o njihovu dugogodišnjem prijateljstvu. Istraživanje se usredotočuje na interpretaciju sadržaja epistolarne građe u kontekstu talijanskoga i dalmatinskoga prosvjetiteljstva i neoklasicizma, s obzirom na teme koje ih zanimaju, na probleme koje dijele i na vrlo različita okruženja iz kojih se dopisuju.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".