Dynamics of multilevel governance in racial equality policies in Brazil
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we examine the dynamics of multilevel governance in racial equality policies in Brazil, comparing the national and local levels, specifically the federal government and the municipality of São Paulo. In addition to the theoretical elements that frame the discussion of federalism, we analyze the legal, organizational, and budgetary contexts inherent to the issue. Accordingly, we seek to answer the following questions: How is the governance of public policies on racial equality influenced by political and institutional factors? Has there been continuity in these policies at the local level, despite signs of dismantling at the national level? We adopt a mixed-methods approach, focusing on the period from 2019 to 2022. In our concluding remarks, we emphasize the need to expand studies that observe and compare local and national dynamics, while considering the impacts of policy dismantling and retrenchment. We also note that, although the federal level exhibited signs of dismantling, retrenchment, and discontinuity, the local level in São Paulo, based on budget data and analysis of organizational design, demonstrated continuity in racial equality policy, at least in terms of institutional instruments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it