MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417426421 · doi:10.3366/nfs.2025.0456

Du corps-victime au corps-vengeur: de la fiction comme une arme

2025· article· en· W4417426421 on OpenAlexaff
Naomi Jouan

Bibliographic record

VenueNottingham French Studies · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLiterature and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTopos theorySubject (documents)Object (grammar)Order (exchange)Frame (networking)Reflection (computer programming)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, I analyze how two French female writers, Virginie Despentes ( Baise-Moi) and Marcia Burnier ( Les Orageuses), subvert the topos of rape and revenge by taking it out of the frame of pointless violence and hypersexualization of women to make it more universal and political. By embracing the codes of the genre in order to better transgress them, these writers are reinventing the genre. By showing how the female body can become a subject of desire and an actor of violence rather than an object of desire or a victim of violence, the two authors offer a more in-depth reflection on what rape and revenge are, and reveal in their novels the importance of friendship, sisterhood and mutual assistance between women to rebuild and reconnect with themselves after sexual assault.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0110.016
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNottingham French StudiesSame topicLiterature and Culture StudiesFrench-language works237,207