MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417426430 · doi:10.3366/nfs.2025.0458

Camille: Seeds, Lactation, Semen and the Ecofeminist Voice

2025· article· en· W4417426430 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNottingham French Studies · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSound Studies and Aurality
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmbodied cognitionSingingPower (physics)Repetition (rhetorical device)EcofeminismLived experience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article explores the ecofeminist aesthetics of French singer-songwriter and performance artist Camille, whose work spans music, dance, film, and experimental vocal performance. Over the past two decades, Camille has drawn vocal inspiration from her embodied experiences of womanhood and motherhood, using her voice to highlight the generative, nourishing, and problematic relational connections between women's bodies and nature. Her artistic philosophy centres on the belief that the singing voice holds affective power to stimulate emotional, sensorial, and ecological connections. Through a close analysis of sonic childlikeness and musematic repetition in “Fontaine de lait” and “Seeds,” this article demonstrates how Camille employs ecofeminist tropes – such as breastmilk, seeds, and semen – to blur boundaries between human and nonhuman, male and female, and voice and body. Ultimately, Camille's voice emerges as a deliberately affective instrument that resonates across corporeal and cultural registers, challenging binary categories and inviting new forms of relationality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.553
Threshold uncertainty score0.654

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.336 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it