Prenatal Exposure to Phthalates, Bisphenols and Their Mixtures and Early Childhood Allergic Conditions and Asthma: Results from the APrON Cohort
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Associations between prenatal exposure to phthalates, bisphenols and their mixtures and early childhood allergic conditions and asthma were examined. Five hundred and fifty-six mother-child pairs from the Alberta Pregnancy Outcomes and Nutrition (APrON) cohort participated. Urine samples collected from mothers during the second trimester of pregnancy were analyzed for phthalates and bisphenols. A child health questionnaire, completed by mothers when children were 12, 24, and 36 months, asked whether children had experienced allergic conditions (i.e., food allergies, eczema, rash) or asthma. In single-chemical models, associations varied with child age. Higher prenatal concentrations of mono-benzyl phthalate (MBzP) were associated with lower odds of eczema at 12 months. At 36 months, higher mono-methyl phthalate (MMP) was associated with increased odds of eczema, whereas higher mono-carboxy-octyl phthalate (MCOP) was associated with reduced odds. Higher prenatal MCOP was also associated with higher odds of rash at 12 months, and higher MMP was associated with higher odds of rash at 36 months. Higher bisphenol S (BPS) was associated with increased odds of asthma at 12 months but decreased odds of eczema and rash at 36 months. Sex-specific effects were also noted. In multi-chemical exposure least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) models, several phthalate metabolites and BPS were selected as the best predictors of eczema and rash at 36 months of age. Bayesian kernel machine regression (BKMR) mixture models suggested that BPS was the most important chemical in predicting eczema in children at 36 months, while MMP and BPS were the most important chemicals in predicting rash at 36 months. Prenatal exposure to certain phthalate metabolites and BPS predicted allergic conditions and asthma in young children, with patterns varying by age and sex. Prenatal exposure to these chemicals may differentially influence immune development and contribute to the development of early-life allergic conditions, with potentially sex-specific susceptibility.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".