MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417431121 · doi:10.1177/00185787251381597

Impact of Intravenous Hydrocortisone on Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation and Outcomes in Patients Receiving Vasopressor Support Following On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

2025· article· en· W4417431121 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueHospital Pharmacy · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsCentre for Advancing Health Outcomes
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBypass graftingAtrial fibrillationArteryHydrocortisoneProspective cohort studyPropensity score matching

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Although 2019 EACTS Guidelines on Cardiopulmonary Bypass in Adult Cardiac Surgery recommend against routine use of prophylactic corticosteroids, perioperative glucocorticoids are still often used to mitigate hypotension, cardiac arrhythmias and respiratory failure following surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Limited data exists on safety and efficacy of intravenous (IV) hydrocortisone in this setting. Objectives: To assess the impact of intravenous hydrocortisone on postoperative complications after on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective chart review between 2021 and 2023. Adult patients with on-pump CABG requiring vasopressor therapy postoperatively were included. Results: Of 153 patients included, 39 received IV hydrocortisone and 114 did not. The hydrocortisone group had significantly lower cortisol levels (15.8 mcg/dL vs 23.9 mcg/dL, P < 0.001) and higher incidence of a past medical history of atrial fibrillation (23.1% vs 2.6%, P < 0.001) compared to the control group. Rates of postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) were similar between groups with 23.1% in the hydrocortisone group and 21.9% in the control group ( P = 0.88), which maintained after controlling for age, history of atrial fibrillation, sex, and propensity score ( P = 0.86). Mean cumulative norepinephrine equivalents (NEE) were similar between hydrocortisone group and control (10.4 mcg/min vs 8.9 mcg/min, P = 0.12). Hydrocortisone administration was associated with longer durations of vasopressor therapy (45.8 vs 28.9 hours, P = 0.001), insulin therapy (149.4 vs 82.2 hours, P = 0.003), and total mechanical ventilation time (59.3 vs 19.4 hours, P = 0.049). There were no differences in surgical site infections between the hydrocortisone group versus control group (5.2% vs 5.2%, P = 1.00), including both non-infectious (2.6% vs 2.6%, P = 1.00) and infectious surgical site complications (2.6% vs 2.6%, P = 1.00). Conclusion: After controlling for sex, age, history of atrial fibrillation/flutter, and propensity score, there was no significant association between the administration of IV hydrocortisone and POAF in patients receiving vasopressor support following on-pump CABG. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.818

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it