MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Flow dynamics around mesh wrapped wall-mounted circular cylinders

2025· article· en· W4417431519 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Fluids and Structures · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsFlow (mathematics)Dynamics (music)Vortex sheddingPotential flowCylinder

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study experimentally investigates the flow around emergent, wall-mounted circular cylinders wrapped in a nine-start bidirectional helical mesh. The motivation stems from the need to reduce local scour in hydraulic and offshore structures, where conventional porous coatings are prone to sediment clogging. The proposed bidirectional mesh acts as a passive flow control method to alter wake dynamics and also potentially enhance heat transfer in pin fin applications. Three mesh configurations with a fixed pitch of 2 d and varying heights, 0.01 d , 0.02 d , and 0.04 d (where d is the cylinder diameter), are evaluated. Experiments were conducted at a Reynolds number of 14,500 (based on cylinder diameter), using particle image velocimetry (PIV) to capture detailed velocity fields and analyze flow structures. At lower mesh heights, only minor deviations from the baseline (bare cylinder) flow are observed. However, the 0.04 d mesh notably reduces wake mean velocity, elongates the recirculation region, and distorts the near-bed wake structure. Instantaneous velocity fields and probability density function analysis reveal enhanced flapping of the separated shear layers at mid-wake for the 0.04 d case. Two-point correlation analysis shows that this configuration increases near-bed coherent structure size, while smaller mesh heights reduce spatial coherence. Upstream of the cylinder, the flow exhibits bimodal unsteadiness, marked by intermittent transitions between back-flow and zero-flow modes, indicating that the horseshoe vortex system is sensitive to mesh height. Reynolds stress distributions at the cylinder-bed junction further highlight that the 0.04 d mesh represents a threshold, beyond which significant changes in both upstream junction flow and downstream wake behaviour become apparent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.235
Threshold uncertainty score0.480

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it