MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417431666 · doi:10.1021/jasms.5c00382

Building In-House Libraries to Use with the NIST/NIJ DART-MS Data Interpretation Tool

2025· article· en· W4417431666 on OpenAlexaff
Arun S. Moorthy, Christany Liggins, J. Tyler Davidson

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicResearch Data Management Practices
Canadian institutionsTrent University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNISTConstruct (python library)Interpretation (philosophy)Ideal (ethics)Data formatBibliographic database

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article presents two programs to help users construct mass spectral libraries for use with the NIST/NIJ DART-MS Data Interpretation Tool (version 3.22). The Full Database Builder program─which is a modification of the original database building script published through NIST─generates libraries that follow the exact specification of the NIST DART-MS Library builder. The Basic Database Builder program requires less information from the user and has fewer computational dependencies, making it an ideal program for users building small in-house libraries for research and testing purposes. The programs are available at https://github.com/asm3-trentu/CRAFTS-DBBuilder.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.085
Threshold uncertainty score0.285

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0060.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.006
Open science0.0050.005
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0850.093

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Society for Mass SpectrometrySame topicResearch Data Management PracticesFrench-language works237,207