MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4417435908 · doi:10.1111/cid.70109

Patients' Awareness, Trust, and Acceptance of Robot‐Assisted Dental Implant Surgery: A Cross‐Sectional Survey

2025· article· en· W4417435908 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yihuang Lin, Pochun Lin, Jason Wang, Cong Li, Mingdeng Rong, Wen-wei Xia

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDentistry
TopicDental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSouthern Medical University
KeywordsDemographicsDental implantImplantPromotion (chess)Patient satisfactionChina

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: To investigate patients' awareness, trust, and acceptance of robot-assisted dental implant surgery in South China, identify the influencing factors, and evaluate the opportunities and challenges to clinical use. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted from November 2024 to August 2025 in three public hospitals in South China. Electronic questionnaires were distributed to patients who had or were scheduled to undergo implant surgery or were considering dental implant treatment. Participants were assigned to Questionnaire A (patients who underwent robot-assisted implantation) or Questionnaire B (patients without such experience). The questionnaire covered the demographic characteristics, awareness level, trust, acceptance, and experience of those treated with robot assistance. RESULTS: Three hundred and ninety six valid questionnaires were administered. Among these, 26.51% accepted robot-assisted implants, 27.78% rejected, and 45.70% were uncertain. In the inexperienced group (n = 382), 61.00% expressed distrust, which was associated with the age, humanistic care, safety, and emergency capabilities of the new technique. In the experienced group (n = 14), 78.60% of patients expressed their willingness to undergo robotic surgery again. The regression analysis revealed that preoperative information negatively affected satisfaction (β = -0.239, p = 0.019), whereas intraoperative experience exhibited a positive effect (β = 0.268, p = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: Patients in South China demonstrated limited awareness of robot-assisted dental implant surgery. Trust was mainly influenced by demographics and safety perceptions, whereas satisfaction relied on intraoperative experiences and recovery. The promotion of robot-assisted implant technology should emphasize technical reliability, doctor-patient communication, improved patient experience, and tailored management for different groups.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.154
GPT teacher head0.487
Teacher spread0.334 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research→Same topicDental Implant Techniques and Outcomes→French-language works237,207→