MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417438808 · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3645123

Real-Time Modeling of Electric Machines for Hardware-in-the-Loop Environment: A State-of-the-Art Review

2025· article· W4417438808 on OpenAlexafffund
Amrutha K. Haridas, Berker Bilgin

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicReal-time simulation and control systems
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsMultiphysicsInterfacingFinite element methodElectric machineMagnetic reluctanceContext (archaeology)Switched reluctance motorTable (database)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hardware-in-the-loop (HIL) simulation enables real-time closed-loop testing of electric drive systems by interfacing machine models with physical controllers. This paper presents a review of real-time modeling approaches for electrical machines in HIL environments. Nonlinearities such as magnetic saturation, cogging torque, spatial harmonics, and thermal effects are examined in the context of analytical, finite element analysis (FEA) based methods, and lookup table driven models. The reviewalso evaluates real-time hardware platforms in terms of execution latency, model compatibility, and integration workflows. A comparative analysis highlights that while induction machine and permanent magnet synchronous machine models are extensively validated, switched reluctance machine (SRM) modeling efforts remain limited, particularly in capturing multiphysics behavior. The reviewexplores the current limitations inSRMmodeling and motivates the development of high-fidelity, multiphysics approaches compatible with real-time HIL simulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.653
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicReal-time simulation and control systemsFrench-language works237,207