MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417438904 · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2025.3637302

VWV-SSL: Carotid vessel-wall-volume segmentation via sequence structural similarity and augmentation consistency-based self-supervised learning

2025· article· en· W4417438904 on OpenAlexaff
Ran Zhou, Furong Wang, Jing Ding, Zhongwei Huang, Haitao Gan, Fumin Guo, Aaron Fenster

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSegmentationFeature (linguistics)Pattern recognition (psychology)3D ultrasoundSimilarity (geometry)Feature extractionMetric (unit)Consistency (knowledge bases)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vessel wall volume (VWV) is a critical three dimensional ultrasound metric used to assess the progression and regression of carotid atherosclerosis. Ac curate measurement of VWV requires the segmentation of the media-adventitia boundary (MAB) and the lumen intima boundary (LIB) of the carotid arteries. Although deep learning methods can automatically segment the MAB and LIB and quantify VWV, they rely heavily on a large dataset with annotated images for training, which is time consuming and labor-intensive. Self-supervised learning (SSL) provides a possible solution to this challenge. However, existing SSL methods do not consider the similarities in the image sequences of 3D ultrasound. This paper proposes a novel SSL algorithm, named VWV-SSL, for 3D carotid ultrasound (3DUS) image segmentation to generate VWV measurement. VWV-SSL utilizes the sequence structural similarity and strong-weak augmented feature consistency of carotid ultrasound images to conduct the self-supervised task, which enables the networks to better learn the feature presentations of the vessel in the self-supervised task training. We applied VWV-SSL on the widely used 3D U-Net and evaluated it on 1158 3D US (579 of the common carotid artery and 579 of the bifurcation) from250subjects.Comparedtobaselinenetworks,our SSL method showed a significant improvement in segmentation performance when trained on a small number of labeled images (n = 15, 45 and 75 subjects). Moreover, the performance of VWV-SSL was superior to that of state-of-art SSL algorithms. These results indicate that our method can improve the performance of 3D U-Net when trained on a small number of labeled images, suggesting that VWV SSL could be applied in clinical practice to monitor the progression of atherosclerosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.659
Threshold uncertainty score0.436

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health InformaticsSame topicCardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionFrench-language works237,207