MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417439644 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.16225

An elementary proof of Newman's eta-quotient theorem

2025· preprint· en· W4417439644 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
David Savitt

Bibliographic record

VenueArXiv.org · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Mathematical Identities
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDedekind cutElementary proofHolomorphic functionMultiplier (economics)Simple (philosophy)Algebra over a fieldCongruence (geometry)Class (philosophy)Number theory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Let eta(z) be the Dedekind eta function. Newman studied the modularity of eta-quotients, giving necessary and sufficient conditions for a function of the form \prod_{0 < m | N} eta(mz)^{r_m} to be a (weakly) holomorphic modular form of level N. We explain a proof of Newman's theorem, developed while teaching a class for talented high school students at Canada/USA Mathcamp. The key observation is that although Gamma_1(N) is not generated by its upper triangular and lower triangular subgroups, it is generated by those subgroups together with any congruence subgroup. Modularity with respect to some congruence subgroup is established using one simple identity involving the multiplier system of eta(z), whose proof is elementary in the sense that it avoids the use of Dedekind sums.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArXiv.orgSame topicAdvanced Mathematical IdentitiesFrench-language works237,207