MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417442890 · doi:10.36368/jcsh.v2i2.1286

Peqqissuserput: A theoretical research model starting from a place of strengths to support Kalaallit Inuit communities to thrive

2025· article· en· W4417442890 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ingelise Olesen, Christina Viskum Lytken Larsen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of community systems for health / · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicIndigenous Studies and Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousCircumpolar starPublic healthPopulation healthGrounded theoryPopulationQualitative researchHealth equityRelevance (law)Research ethics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Health research in Kalaallit Nunaat (Greenland) has traditionally focused on risk factors and deficits, often without being grounded in Kalaallit Inuit knowledge systems or led by Indigenous researchers. Such approaches have limited relevance for communities and may undermine ethical engagement. This paper presents Peqqissuserput (“Our Health”) and the principles we work from at Innuttaasut Peqqissusiannik Ilisimatusarfik (Centre for Public Health in Greenland) research model starting from a place of strengths to support Kalaallit Inuit communities to continue to thrive and ensure that our research is ethical and meaningful. Methods: The model was developed through an iterative process spanning two decades of community-engaged research conducted at Innuttaasut Peqqissusiannik Ilisimatusarfik (Centre for Public Health in Greenland). The work draws on long-term partnerships with Kalaallit Inuit communities, national population health surveys, qualitative studies, sharing circles, lived experience, and dialogue with Indigenous research centres across the Arctic. The model is informed by key ethical frameworks, including the Circumpolar Inuit Protocols for Equitable and Ethical Engagement, the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, and Greenland’s National Research Strategy. Results: Peqqissuserput is grounded in the concept of peqqinneq, a culturally specific understanding of balance and well-being rooted in relationships with people, land, animals, and Sila. At its core is the metaphysical triad of timi (body), tarneq (mind), and anersaaq (spirit), surrounded by eleven interrelated elements. These include both well-established social determinants of health and culturally specific dimensions such as language, family and relationships, joy of community, local values, country food, and connection to nature and animals. Five guiding principles underpin the model, emphasizing respect for Inuit knowledge systems, language, humility, storytelling as evidence, and commitment to the common good. Conclusion: Peqqissuserput represents a shift from deficit-based health research toward a strengths-based, culturally grounded framework rooted in Kalaallit Inuit ways of knowing and being. The model offers a practical and ethical pathway for researchers, policymakers, and practitioners to work in partnership with communities to understand and promote health and well-being in Kalaallit Nunaat.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.020
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.114

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0200.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0120.042
Scholarly communication0.0130.015
Open science0.0040.014
Research integrity0.0040.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.167
GPT teacher head0.530
Teacher spread0.363 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of community systems for health /Same topicIndigenous Studies and EcologyFrench-language works237,207