Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract When it comes to that which is “toxic”, it must be inhaled. Whatever chemical, whatever its molecular composition, it is inhaled through the nose, and it enters the body. In this paper, I explore toxicity as that which is smelt, that which is inhaled and taken in as part of the body. This paper, divided into three sections, explores toxic odors as intrinsically linked to breathing (since to smell is to breathe), as carriers of a particular aesthetic, and as tools for resistance. Through examples from organizations such as Nez Normands, literary texts such as Robert Antelme’s L’espèce humaine , and exhibits such as Par la fumée , I explore how toxic odors complicate established systems of representation and how these undo dichotomies that label smells as either “good” or “bad”. Toxic scents, as this smell studies analysis shows, can be a source of art, pride, resistance, and politics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it