SE-Attention Enhanced Sensing-Aided CSI Feedback for mMIMO Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Massive multiple input multiple output (mMIMO) systems require accurate channel state information (CSI) feedback but face high overhead. Existing deep learning methods ignore environmental information, while sensing-assisted frameworks reduce dimensionality at the cost of noise amplification in channel reconstruction. To address this, we enhance the RENet recovery network and propose RENet+, which incorporates a squeeze-and-excitation (SE) attention mechanism to adaptively recalibrate channel features. This design suppresses redundant components while emphasizing critical angular-spread information. As the first work integrating SE attention into sensing-aided CSI recovery, the proposed method significantly improves reconstruction accuracy under low feedback overhead. Evaluated on Saleh-Valenzuela channel models with 5 scatterers, the jointly trained JNet-Joint+ achieves NMSE gains of 4.7 dB and 6.4 dB over CsiNet at compression ratios (CR) of 64 and 128, respectively, and outperforms the original JNet-Joint by 0.9 dB (CR=64) and 0.7 dB (CR=128).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".