MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417447894 · doi:10.3389/fneur.2025.1676496

The impact of moxibustion on brain function in vascular dementia: a neuroimaging study involving amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations and functional connectivity

2025· article· en· W4417447894 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yating Zhang, Zhilin Huang, Ping Wang, Sicheng Liu, Yinqiu Fan, Bixiang Zha, Jun Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Neurology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcupuncture Treatment Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAnhui University of Chinese MedicineAnhui University
KeywordsFunctional connectivityNeuroimagingMoxibustionBrain functionFunctional neuroimagingCognitionFunction (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Object On the basis of determining the clinical effect of moxibustion on vascular dementia (VD), this study explored the central mechanism of moxibustion on VD through fMRI. Method Fifty-five VD patients formed the observation group (treated with moxibustion at GV20, GV14, and GV24; 20 min/acupoint, once every other day, three times a week) and 50 healthy individuals served as the control group. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) were administered, and fMRI data collected, pre- and post-treatment for the observation group, and once for the control group. Amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation (ALFF) was analyzed for pre-treatment fMRI data of both groups. Regions of interest (ROI) were defined by discrepant brain regions, and functional connectivity (FC) was analyzed for the observation group. Result After moxibustion treatment, MoCA scores increased with a mean difference (MD) of 2.0385 (95% CI, 1.6867 to 2.3902), and MMSE scores with an MD of 3.3077 (95% CI, 2.7997 to 3.8156), both significantly ( p < 0.01). Regarding fMRI findings, baseline ALFF alterations in VD patients vs. controls included increased values in the bilateral hippocampus (HIP), precuneus, and left middle temporal gyrus (MTG), and decreased values in the left posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) and insula (INS) (FDR-corrected p < 0.05). After moxibustion treatment, significant FC increases were observed: left PCC with right superior/inferior temporal gyrus, left INS with right superior temporal gyrus/superior occipital gyrus and left inferior temporal gyrus, left HIP with right superior temporal gyrus and left PCC, and right HIP with bilateral postcentral gyrus and left fusiform gyrus (GRF-corrected: voxel p < 0.005, cluster p < 0.05). Additionally, pre-treatment left MTG ALFF was negatively correlated with MMSE ( p < 0.05, r = −0.486). Post-treatment, FC of left PCC-right superior/inferior temporal gyrus ( r = 0.650/0.638), left HIP-left PCC ( r = 0.456), and right HIP-left fusiform gyrus ( r = 0.411) were positively correlated with MMSE ( p < 0.05). Discussion Moxibustion can effectively improve the cognitive dysfunction in VD patients, possibly by promoting DMN functional recovery and facilitating functional reorganization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in NeurologySame topicAcupuncture Treatment Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207