MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417449831 · doi:10.1364/optcon.583203

M-TRACE: a MATLAB toolkit for animated raytracing based on scalable vector graphics illustration

2025· article· en· W4417449831 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Patrick Kilcullen, T. Ozaki, Jinyang Liang

Bibliographic record

VenueOptics Continuum · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputer Graphics and Visualization Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsScalable Vector GraphicsSoftwareAnimationVisualizationPersonalizationScalabilityKey (lock)GraphicsSimple (philosophy)Computer graphics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Modern optical design and simulation software, while both powerful and feature-rich, requires significant training investment for effective use, even for simple optical design tasks. By contrast, software for two-dimensional (2D) non-sequential raytracing, while sufficient for many optical design tasks and popular for educational purposes, has remained without the benefit of mature computer-aided design (CAD) technologies that are now a key feature of software dedicated to three-dimensional (3D) optical design. To overcome this limitation, we introduce M-TRACE—an open source toolkit for non-sequential 2D raytracing with scripting-based customization and animation capabilities implemented in MATLAB. This toolkit allows users to specify optical designs using tools compatible with free-form 2D illustration via scalable vector graphics (SVG), analogous to the integration of 3D CAD technologies with enterprise optical design software. The intuitive and precise drawing features of SVG illustration software (e.g., Adobe Illustrator, Inkscape) allow for a straightforward means for the creation of system designs. We intend M-TRACE to complement the spectrum of available optical design software for research, development, and education, specifically targeting design cases requiring rich visualization and/or rapid exploration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.058
Threshold uncertainty score0.193

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0580.019

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOptics ContinuumSame topicComputer Graphics and Visualization TechniquesFrench-language works237,207