MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417452223 · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv-2025-d0j2v

j-IR-vis: Vision model for Infrared spectroscopy embeddings

2025· article· W4417452223 on OpenAlexafffund
Rudra Sondhi, E. CHACKO, Rodrigo A. Vargas–Hernández

Bibliographic record

VenueChemRxiv · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMachine Learning in Materials Science
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsFingerprint (computing)Similarity (geometry)Pattern recognition (psychology)TransferabilityInfrared spectroscopyEncoderSpectroscopySpectral lineInfrared

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Infrared (IR) spectroscopy provides rich structural information, but interpreting spectra at scale remains challenging. Here, we introduce j-IR-vis, a vision model trained on IR spectra for functional-group prediction and downstream molecular characterization. Trained separately on simulated (Dsim) and experimental (Dexp) datasets, j-IR-vis achieves strong functional group classification accuracy, with exact-match ratios of 0.77-0.81 on Dsim and 0.67-0.76 on Dexp, and macro-F1 scores up to 0.93. Grad-CAM saliency maps reveal that the model tends to focus on the fingerprint region (1500-400 cm-1), consistent with the model being sensitive to vibrational features in this region. Embedding-space analyses show that the inclusion of this region improves all geometric metrics-RankMe, Silhouette, Separation, and Lift-indicating a richer and more structured latent manifold. Fixed embeddings further enable accurate prediction of aromatic ring counts (weighted F1 = 0.69) and octanol-water partition coefficients (RMSE = 1.18, Spearman's ρ = 0.59), demonstrating representation reuse for structural and physicochemical tasks without retraining the vision backbone. Finally, cosine-similarity analyses reveal that j-IR-vis captures complementary chemical relationships compared to traditional fingerprint-based representations. Together, these results establish j-IR-vis as a reusable spectral encoder that bridges experimental spectroscopy and molecular machine learning, offering a spectra informed route to multi-modal chemical representations. j-IR-vis is openly accessible through the GitHub repository https://github.com/ChemAI-Lab/jirvis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemRxivSame topicMachine Learning in Materials ScienceFrench-language works237,207