MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417454642 · doi:10.1007/s10980-025-02230-w

Harvest-induced changes in forest landscapes does not fully compensate for climate-induced increase in landscape flammability in eastern Canada

2025· article· en· W4417454642 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Clémence Benoît, Yan Boulanger, Jonathan Boucher

Bibliographic record

VenueLandscape Ecology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFire effects on ecosystems
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à MontréalNatural Resources CanadaCanadian Forest Service
FundersNatural Resources CanadaMinistère des Ressources Naturelles et de la FauneUniversité du Québec à Montréal
KeywordsFlammabilityTaigaClimate changeBorealFire regimeGlobal warmingFlammable liquidFire ecology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Context Wildfires are a major natural disturbance in boreal ecosystems, strongly influenced by both climate-driven fire weather and fuel characteristics. While climate change is intensifying fire-prone weather conditions, other natural and human-related disturbances, as well as natural evolution of forest stands, are reshaping forest composition, potentially altering landscape flammability. The net effect of these opposing forces remains uncertain in eastern Canada's boreal forest. Objectives We assess whether changes in the forest fuel landscape as well as changes in fire weather have mitigated or exacerbated the potential behavior of wildfire across Quebec’s commercial forest zone. Specifically, we analyze trends in predicted intensity and speed of potential fires from 1978 to 2023 as well as the effect of harvesting and other disturbances on these trends. Methods Using the Canadian Forest Fire Behavior Prediction (FBP) System, we estimated potential head fire intensity and speed based on reconstructed ERA5 daily fire weather at local solar noon and high-resolution (~ 14 ha) annual fuel maps, from 1978 to 2023. We disentangled climate-driven (top-down) and fuel-driven (bottom-up) influences by comparing scenarios with fixed vs. dynamic fuels and weather conditions. Results Landscape flammability has increased significantly in some regions over the study period, primarily due to rising fire-prone weather conditions. Despite a general long-term decline in flammable fuels associated with timber harvesting and post-disturbance succession, these changes were sometimes insufficient to offset climate-driven increases in potential head fire intensity and spread. The western and northern regions of the study area exhibited the most pronounced trends toward exacerbated fire behavior, aligning with increased temperatures and fire-prone weather. Conclusions Fire weather intensification is emerging as the dominant driver of landscape flammability, overriding mitigation effects from fuel changes in many regions. This suggests that future wildfire risk in eastern Canada will continue to rise under climate change, despite ongoing shifts in forest composition. These findings highlight the need for adaptive fire management strategies that account for both fuel and climate-driven changes in wildfire regimes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.179

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLandscape EcologySame topicFire effects on ecosystemsFrench-language works237,207