MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417458207 · doi:10.1080/01443615.2025.2581482

Expert consensus for the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease in pregnancy: collaborative insights from experts in India

2025· article· en· W4417458207 on OpenAlexaff
Aniruddha Pratap Singh, Krithi Krishna Koduri, Rakesh Kalapala, S Shantha Kumari, Madhuri A. Patel, P. Balamba, T. S. Chandrasekar, Ajay Kumar, Girija Wagh, Yash Khanna, Vandana Hegde, Srilatha Gorthi, M Lakshmi Rathna, Pradev Inavolu, Hardik Rughwani, Ritu Khanna, Shobna Bhatia, D. Nageshwar Reddy

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastroesophageal reflux and treatments
Canadian institutionsCReATe Fertility Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGERDDiseaseRefluxDisease managementMEDLINE

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is common during pregnancy. In India, its management varies and is often based on Western guidelines, which may not reflect local dietary patterns, drug availability, or diagnostic constraints. To address this gap, an expert panel of Indian gastroenterologists and gynaecologists aimed to develop consensus recommendations tailored for Indian practice. METHODS: Modified Delphi consensus method was followed. Steering committee with three gastroenterologists was formed. This committee reviewed available literature and identified 65 relevant articles, based on which 9 pilot consensus statements were formed. An expert panel comprising 9 gastroenterologists and 6 gynaecologists located pan-India was formed. Pre-reads were circulated a month in advance, and 15 experts discussed evidence and pilot statements during the consensus meeting. Based on the discussion, modified statements were shared with the experts through a Google form for voting using a 5-point Likert scale. Consensus was defined as ≥80% agreement. Results were analysed by the steering committee, followed by a virtual meeting to finalise statements. The manuscript was drafted and circulated for final approval. RESULTS: Six consensus statements were finalised, with 100% agreement. (1a) Symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux are common during pregnancy. (1b) Gastroesophageal reflux is associated with poor health-related quality of life in pregnancy. (2) Diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux during pregnancy should be based on symptoms. (3) Endoscopy must be postponed to the post-partum period, except in the presence of alarm symptoms. (4) Lifestyle changes are recommended as the first step in management. (5) Alginates/antacids should be preferred as the first-line pharmacological treatment after lifestyle changes. (6) Histamine-2 receptor antagonists or proton pump inhibitors are effective and may be used if symptoms are not controlled by alginates/antacids alone. CONCLUSION: These consensus statements provide practical guidance for diagnosing and managing GERD in pregnancy, emphasising symptom-based diagnosis, lifestyle interventions, and judicious pharmacological therapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.144
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.185
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.144
Threshold uncertainty score0.760

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1440.185
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0050.003
Science and technology studies0.0050.004
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0040.013
Research integrity0.0050.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Obstetrics and GynaecologySame topicGastroesophageal reflux and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207