MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417458373 · doi:10.1212/nxg.0000000000200334

<i>DEGS1</i> -Related Hypomyelinating Leukodystrophy

2025· article· en· W4417458373 on OpenAlexaff
M Grinberg, Breanne Dale, Rajesh RamachandranNair, Mark A. Tarnopolsky, Robyn Whitney, Resham Ejaz

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology Genetics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA regulation and disease
Canadian institutionsMcMaster Children's HospitalMcMaster UniversityMcMaster University Medical Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLeukodystrophyNatural historyPhenotypeStroke (engine)Clinical phenotype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives: -related leukodystrophy with phenotypic heterogeneity both within the family and in previously reported individuals. Methods: Four related individuals were followed by the neurology, genetics, and neurometabolic teams with clinical examinations, MRI brain, and genetic/metabolic investigations. Trio exome sequencing (ES) was completed after initial investigations returned normal. Results: , c.110T>C (p.Met37Thr), for the proband with subsequent confirmatory testing of remaining affected family members. While the affected individuals share many similarities, there is notable variability in severity between them as well as with other 33 previously reported individuals, including 2 with the same pathogenic variant. This variability is highlighted in the presence of seizures, nystagmus, failure to thrive, microcephaly, MRI brain findings, and age at disease onset. Discussion: -related leukodystrophy and adds to the current understanding of the phenotypic range of affected individuals. Consideration of variability in the condition's natural history and outcome is key to appropriately counsel patients and families.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurology GeneticsSame topicRNA regulation and diseaseFrench-language works237,207