MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417461112 · doi:10.1080/10130950.2025.2597216

Gender Transformation, Homelessness and Economic Precarity in Ontario, Canada

2025· article· en· W4417461112 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Naomi Nichols, Mary Anne Martin

Bibliographic record

VenueAgenda · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHomelessness and Social Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrecarityWork (physics)IntersectionalityGovernment (linguistics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article explores the “how” of gender transformation under conditions of increasing inequality and insecurity in the Canadian province of Ontario. The point of entry for our exploration is the increase in gendered survival work associated with acute poverty and homelessness – both of which are rapidly increasing alongside stagnating national progress towards gender equality in Canada as indicated by the 2024 Sustainable Development Goals Gender Index. To produce our analysis, we drew on qualitative interview data from 18 women and gender-diverse people experiencing homelessness. Data was drawn from a larger sample of 49 people experiencing homelessness in Peterborough. Our findings illuminate critical dimensions of Canada’s stagnating progress towards gender equality. We explicate how the intensification of women and gender-diverse people’s work is organized by institutional responses to material and relational precarity across the life-course; the provision of homelessness services organized by the gender-binary; and the normalization of gender-based violence, and gendered experiences of (un)safety for women and gender-diverse people experiencing homelessness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.615

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAgendaSame topicHomelessness and Social IssuesFrench-language works237,207