MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417466535 · doi:10.3390/cli13120254

Viscous Baroclinic-Barotropic Instability in the Tropics: Is It the Source of Both Easterly Waves and Monsoon Depressions?

2025· article· en· W4417466535 on OpenAlexafffund
Ahlem Boucherikha, Abderrahim Kacimi, Boualem Khouider

Bibliographic record

VenueClimate · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate variability and models
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBaroclinityBarotropic fluidInstabilityEddyWavenumberZonal and meridionalRossby waveShear (geology)Wave propagation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study investigates the impact of eddy viscosity on equatorially trapped waves and the instability of the background shear in a simple barotropic–baroclinic model. It is the first study to include eddy viscosity in the study of tropical wave dynamics. This study also unifies the study of baroclinic and barotropic instabilities by using a coupled barotopic and baroclinic model of the tropical atmosphere. Linear wave theory is combined with a systematic Galerkin projection of the baroclinic dynamical fields onto parabolic cylinder functions. This study investigates varying shear strengths, eddy viscosities, and their combined effects. In the absence of shear, baroclinic and barotropic waves decouple. The baroclinic waves themselves separate into triads, forming the equatorially trapped wave modes known as Matsuno waves. However, when a strong eddy viscosity is included, the structure and propagation characteristics of these equatorial waves are significantly altered. Different wave types interact, leading to strong mixing in the meridional direction and coupling between meridional modes. This coupling destroys the Matsuno mode separation and offers pathways for these waves to couple and interact with one another. These results suggest that viscosity does not simply suppress growth; it may also reshape the propagation characteristics of unstable modes. In the presence of a background shear, some wave modes become unstable, and barotropic and baroclinic waves are coupled. Without eddy viscosity, instability begins with small scale and slowly propagating modes, at arbitrary small shear strengths. This instability manifests as an ultra-violet catastrophe. As the shear strength increases, the catastrophic instability at small scales expands to high-frequency waves. Meanwhile, instability peaks emerge at synoptic and planetary scales along several Rossby mode branches. When a small eddy viscosity is reintroduced, the catastrophic small-scale instabilities disappear, while the large-scale Rossby wave instabilities persist. These westward-moving modes exhibit a mixed barotropic–baroclinic structure with signature vortices straddling the equator. Some vortices are centered close to the equator, while others are far away. Some waves resemble synoptic-scale monsoon depressions and tropical easterly waves, while others operate on the planetary scale and present elongated shapes reminiscent of atmospheric-river flow patterns.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClimateSame topicClimate variability and modelsFrench-language works237,207