Texture Analysis of Histology Images for Characterizing Ultrasound-Stimulated Microbubble Radiation Enhancement Treatment Response
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ultrasound-stimulated microbubble (USMB) therapy, in combination with radiotherapy (XRT), represents a promising approach to enhancing the efficacy of conventional cancer treatments by targeting tumor vasculature. Recent preclinical studies using MRI-guided focused ultrasound have demonstrated that USMB enhances radiation effects in tumor blood vessels, resulting in significantly greater tumor cell death than radiation alone. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) has been instrumental in this methodology in mapping tumor perfusion heterogeneity, allowing for precise targeting of additional USMB and XRT to specific vascular regions. This study employed four advanced texture analysis methods, GLCM, GLDM, GLSZM, and NGTDM, to quantitatively assess changes in the cellular structure of prostate tumors following different treatments, including combinations of USMB and XRT targeted to low- and high-perfusion regions. Texture features, particularly those derived from GLCM, GLDM, and GLSZM, revealed significant differences in cell structure patterns across treatment groups. The GLSZM methodology was identified as the most sensitive method for detecting treatment-induced structural changes, effectively identifying regions of necrosis and varied stages of cell death. Texture-derivative analyses further highlighted intra-tumoral heterogeneity, especially in response to additional USMB + XRT treatments. These results align with findings in other tissue models, underscoring the value of texture analysis for monitoring treatment response.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".