MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417467005 · doi:10.1159/000550112

Comparative Genomics of Viral Genomes and Identification of Three Novel Viroporin-Like Superfamilies

2025· article· en· W4417467005 on OpenAlexaff
Jia‐Ning Wang, Kevin J. Hendargo, Katie Jing Kay Lam, Gabriel Moreno‐Hagelsieb, Arturo Medrano-Soto, Milton H. Saier

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrobial Physiology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicBacteriophages and microbial interactions
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComparative genomicsIdentification (biology)GenomicsGenomeHomology (biology)Sequence homologyDNA sequencingSequence alignment

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Viroporins are small multifunctional proteins that modify cellular membranes facilitating processes such as viral nucleic acid entry and the release of virions from infected cells. We are interested in studying the evolutionary relationships among these proteins, in particular their organization into families and superfamilies. METHODS: We applied a variety of computational strategies to perform comparative genomics analyses of 120 viral genomes, using the phylogenetic profile method. This allowed the identification of 12 families, organized into four functionally related groups. Additionally, we compiled a list of 40 families from the Transporter Classification Database (TCDB) with viroporin-like attributes (i.e., length ≤300 aas, similar topologies, and/or documented viroporin activities). We then used TCDB as a reference to search for evidence of homology among families. Our well-established bioinformatic pipeline for inference of homology included (1) sequence similarity, (2) compatibility of topology and hydropathy profiles, (3) similarity of family-based HMM profiles, (4) shared motifs, and (5) conserved domains. RESULTS: We were able to infer homology among 15 families, four of which (Vpu-C, p10 viroporin/GDU1, FAST, and R-FAST) expanded the established Influenza A/B Virus M2 Protein (M2) superfamily. The other families constituted three novel superfamilies: viroporin-1, consisting of three families (RVP10, NS3, and NSP4); viroporin-2, composed of two functionally linked families (SARS-VP and M-protein); and viroporin-3 composed of 3 functionally related families (viroporin E, IBV-E, and PRRSV). CONCLUSION: The application of comparative genomics and remote homology identification strategies allowed the classification of homologous and functionally related viroporin-like families into superfamilies. These results will be useful in future functional, mechanistic, and evolutionary studies of viroporins.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicrobial PhysiologySame topicBacteriophages and microbial interactionsFrench-language works237,207