MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417467291 · doi:10.1007/s11255-025-04902-7

Prospective associations between the CKD-mineral bone disorder and metabolic acidosis

2025· article· en· W4417467291 on OpenAlexaff
Hülya Taşkapan, Seyed Mohammad Mahdavi, Antonio Bellasi, Berkay Taskapan, Paul Tam, Tabo Sikaneta

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Urology and Nephrology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal function and acid-base balance
Canadian institutionsThe Scarborough HospitalToronto Rehabilitation InstituteUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetabolic acidosisSubclinical infectionProspective cohort studyMetabolic disorderNephrologyAcidosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The common chronic kidney disease (CKD)-associated complications of mineral bone disorder (MBD) and metabolic acidosis share some biochemical features that physiologic studies suggest may be linked by the effects of progressive acidosis on bone and kidney. To explore this further, we examined prospective associations between key elements of the CKD-MBD and the subsequent appearance of subclinical and clinical metabolic acidosis in patients with stage 3/4 CKD. METHODS: Post hoc analysis of 1993 CAN AIM TO PREVENT participants followed for 2.86 years per participant. Mixed-effects linear and logistic regression were used to evaluate prospective associations between phosphate, calcium, 25(OH)D, PTH, and FGF-23 with (1) declining plasma bicarbonate, (2) subclinical metabolic acidosis (bicarbonate 22-24 mmol/L), and (3) clinical metabolic acidosis (bicarbonate < 22 mmol/L). RESULTS: Each mmol/L increase in phosphate predicted a lower bicarbonate (- 1.29 mmol/L (95% CI - 1.61, - 0.98; p < 0.001)), and increased odds for subclinical (OR 1.92 (1.32, 2.79); p = 0.001) and clinical metabolic acidosis (OR 5.03 (3.16, 7.93); p < 0.001). Each mmol/L increase in calcium predicted a higher bicarbonate (2.70 mmol/L (2.11, 3.30; p < 0.001)), and decreased odds for subclinical (OR 0.23 (0.11, 0.46); p < 0.001) and clinical metabolic acidosis (OR 0.15 (0.06, 0.37); p < 0.001). Each unit increase in log-transformed 25(OH)D predicted a higher bicarbonate (0.38 mmol/L (0.23, 0.53); p < 0.001)), and decreased odds for subclinical (OR 0.67 (0.56, 0.80); p < 0.001) and clinical metabolic acidosis (OR 0.65 (0.50, 0.82); p < 0.001). Log-PTH exhibited a non-linear relationship with acidosis risk: moderate elevations were associated with reduced acidosis risk (OR 0.60 (0.40, 0.90); p = 0.013), while higher levels predicted an increased risk for subclinical (OR 1.42 (1.02, 1.98); p = 0.041) but not clinical metabolic acidosis (OR 1.44 (0.93, 2.24); p = 0.103). No significant associations were found between log-FGF-23 and acidosis risk (OR 1.02 (0.88, 1.19); p = 0.767). CONCLUSION: Key elements of the CKD-MBD were independently and prospectively associated with the subsequent development of subclinical and clinical metabolic acidosis. Future studies could examine whether a causal relationship exists between progressive metabolic acidosis and the CKD-MBD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.079
Threshold uncertainty score0.268

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Urology and NephrologySame topicRenal function and acid-base balanceFrench-language works237,207