MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

In-Chip Data Processing and Readout Architecture of a Photon-to-Digital Converter in 65 nm For Crystal-Based Applications

2025· article· W4417470851 on OpenAlexaff
Sean Prentice, Raffaele Aaron Giampaolo, T. Rossignol, N. Roy, Simon Carrier, Guillaume Théberge‐Dupuis, J.‐F. Pratte, Serge A. Charlebois

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Optical Sensing Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTimestampSkewData acquisitionModular designData processingEnergy (signal processing)ArchitectureBandwidth (computing)Scintillation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Our team is designing a 5×5 mm23D-integrated Photon-to-Digital Converter (PDC) comprising a 64×64 SPAD array with a custom 65 nm CMOS readout. The PDC is partitioned into 16 sectors (1.25 × 1.25 mm2), each holding 256~SPADs and 64~time-to-digital converters (TDCs) with an 8-to-1 ratio. At high event rates, the unprocessed data stream exceeds the available bandwidth of 2 Gbps (CML transceiver) resulting in sector-level deadtime. To mitigate this, we are developing a processing architecture featuring parallel time and energy processing chains with early data reduction. The time chain performs skew correction, dark count suppression, timestamp alignment, and sorting. A linear unbiased estimator further compresses timing data into a single timestamp. The energy chain sums trigger counts over configurable time windows to detect scintillation events. A binning module further compresses time and energy data through energy-discriminated binning at the sector level. The modular architecture accommodates multiple acquisition modes (synchronous, asynchronous, camera) and output formats (timestamps, histograms, hitmaps, heatmaps). This architecture is capable of addressing applications such as time-of-flight (TOF) positron emission tomography (TOF-PET) and time-of-flight computed tomography (TOF-CT), as well as other non-scintillation-based applications such as quantum key distribution and wavefront sensing for adaptive optics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Optical Sensing TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207