MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A 3.12 ps rms Ring Oscillator-Based Cascaded Vernier Time-to-Digital Converter with Two-Stages in TSMC 65 nm

2025· article· W4417470853 on OpenAlexaff
Guillaume Théberge‐Dupuis, R. Scarpellini, Raffaele Aaron Giampaolo, N. Roy, T. Rossignol, J.‐F. Pratte, Serge A. Charlebois

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Optical Sensing Technologies
Canadian institutionsInstitut interdisciplinaire d'innovation technologiqueUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVernier scaleTime-to-digital converterDiodeDifferential nonlinearityConvertersChipCMOSPower (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Our team is working on a photon-to-digital converter composed of an array of 4096 single-photon avalanche diodes (SPAD) each connected in 3D with a quenching circuit and 512 time-to-digital converters (TDC) in an 8-to-1 configuration. The target applications of this device are time-offlight (ToF) positron emission tomography, ToF computed tomography, quantum key distribution, and wavefront sensing for astronomy. A common requirement for these applications is a hightiming precision on the time of interaction of the photons. To this end, we developed a 43 μm × 35 μm TDC that utilizes a ring oscillator-based cascaded Vernier with 2 stages. In a test chip fabricated in TSMC 65 nm, composed of two 16 SPAD-quench arrays connected each to 8 TDCs in a 4-to-2 configuration. The TDC achieved a precision of 3.12 ps rms with a LSB of 8.23 ps for a dynamic range of 4 ns and a power consumption of 28.6 μW at 1 Mcps. We also detected a systematic nonlinearity issue in one of the TDC subcircuits. The presentation will discuss the advantages and design challenges of this TDC architecture, with an emphasis on the problematic subcircuit and the challenges of integrating TDCs in arrays.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.475
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Optical Sensing TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207