MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4417471334 · doi:10.36939/ir.202512181214

Assessing the in vitro effects of priority Arctic contaminants using cell-based transcriptomics

2025· dissertation· en· W4417471334 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Chathuri P. Mudalige

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEffects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMcGill University
KeywordsTranscriptomeToxicogenomicsPolybrominated diphenyl ethersContext (archaeology)Polybrominated BiphenylsPollutantContaminationBioaccumulationXenobiotic

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Persistent organic pollutants (POPs) are a diverse group of chemicals that resist degradation, bioaccumulate in food webs, and pose risks to human health. Despite international regulation, both legacy and emerging POPs remain widely detected in the environment and human populations. To support the transition toward new approach methodologies (NAMs) that minimize animal use, this study employed human cell–based transcriptomics to investigate the molecular and concentration-dependent effects of POPs. Using human liver (HepG2) and adrenal (H295R) cell models, transcriptional responses to multiple contaminant classes, including organophosphate and organochlorine pesticides, perfluorooctane sulfonic acid, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB), and polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE), were evaluated. Cytotoxicity assessment, differential gene expression analysis, benchmark dose (BMD) modeling, and biological pathway analysis were integrated to derive transcriptomic points of departure (tPODs) and characterize molecular responses. Concentration-dependent transcriptional changes revealed distinct molecular signatures across chemicals, reflecting diverse modes of action. Benchmark dose modeling of transcriptomic data yielded tPODs that were generally within an order of magnitude of reported apical effect concentrations, demonstrating the relevance of these molecular thresholds for risk assessment. Comparative analysis of PCB-138 between the two cell types indicated cell-specific transcriptional responses, emphasizing the importance of tissue context in evaluating POP toxicity. Overall, this work demonstrates the value of in vitro transcriptomic profiling for mechanistic and quantitative toxicity assessment of POPs. Integrating gene expression and dose–response modeling approaches provides an animal-free framework for defining biologically meaningful toxicity thresholds and advancing next-generation chemical risk assessment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.334 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEffects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals→French-language works237,207→