MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

A Real-Time Embedded Digital Processing Architecture for a Modular Time-of-Flight Computed Tomography Readout using a FPGA-based TDC

2025· article· W4417471644 on OpenAlexaff
F. Gagnon, Quentin Wingering, L.-D. Gaulin, F. Cournoyer, J. Rossignol, Marc‐André Tétrault, Réjean Fontaine

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsApplication-specific integrated circuitModular designField-programmable gate arrayEthernetTime-to-digital converterChannel (broadcasting)HistogramBackplane

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Time-of-flight (TOF) in computed tomography (CT) can lead to an increase in image quality with no loss of sensitivity. To implement this approach, a new architecture using a FGPAbased TDC is being developed. Our group has developed a FPGA-based Time-To-Digital converter (TDC) and a new front-end electronics board which allows a more flexible testbench testing for various Silicon Photomultiplier (SiPM) configurations. The readout can explore different data extraction strategies prior to ASIC implementation. To solve this problem, a FPGA-based TDC is used to generate the necessary timestamps. The data is compressed by generating one histogram per channel in a dedicated dual port RAM. Along with front-end electronics board and the FPGA-based TDC, a custom Linux driver running on the CPU allows the transfer between the FPGA and the computer through an Ethernet Link for data post-processing. The system has two separate channels : time and energy channels. Only the time channel has been tested and the results can be improved by implementing TDC calibration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications→French-language works237,207→