MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417471863 · doi:10.5120/ijca2025926002

Representation Learning with Adaptive Superpixel Coding

2025· article· W4417471863 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Computer Applications · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Data Compression Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoding (social sciences)Representation (politics)Feature learningNeural codingPattern recognition (psychology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Deep learning vision models are typically tailored for specific modalities and often rely on domain-specific assumptions, such as the grid structures used by most existing architectures.This paper introduces a self-supervised Transformer-based model called Adaptive Superpixel Coding (ASC).The key idea behind the approach is to address the limitations of traditional Vision Transformers, which depend on fixed-size and non-adaptive patch partitioning.Instead, ASC employs adaptive superpixel layers that dynamically adjust to the underlying image content.The study analyzes the properties that make the proposed method effective and demonstrates that the approach outperforms widely used baselines on standard image downstream task benchmarks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.753
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it