MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417476227 · doi:10.24911/ijmdc.51-1759667128

Awareness about the role of artificial intelligence in diagnostic radiology among medical students in Saudi Arabia: a crosssectional study

2025· article· W4417476227 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alzahrani, Bader Alghamdi, Haneen Altowairqi, Wajd Alotaibi, Nawaf Alsyali, Faris Alharthi, Mashael Alhumaidi Alotaibi

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Medicine in Developing Countries · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurriculumQuarter (Canadian coin)Test (biology)Descriptive statisticsPerceptionMEDLINE

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Artificial Intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing radiology practice by supporting diagnostic accuracy and efficiency, yet many radiologists have not integrated it into their daily workflows. However, literature on radiology AI knowledge and perceptions among medical students is limited, both globally and within Saudi Arabia. Objectives: This study evaluates the extent of knowledge and understanding of AI applications in radiology among medical students from various universities in Saudi Arabia. Methodology: We conducted a cross-sectional study involving 351 medical students from different universities in Saudi Arabia. The online questionnaire included demographic characteristics and questions regarding awareness of AI applications in radiology, as well as preferred learning methods. Descriptive statistics were used for basic understanding, and the chi-square test was employed to assess associations between demographic characteristics and awareness of AI. Results: The survey revealed that 66.9% of participants had some level of awareness regarding AI in radiology, whereas 33.1% had little or no knowledge of it. The presence of a dedicated radiology module in the curriculum was significantly associated with higher awareness of AI applications (p < 0.001). The preferred learning methods included lectures (47.3%), workshops (43.0%), and extracurricular activities (35.3%). A total of 59.3% of students agreed or strongly agreed that AI should be included in the medical curriculum; however, only a quarter felt they had adequate opportunities to learn about it. Conclusion: There is a high level of awareness of AI among medical students in Saudi Arabia, but this does not equate to comprehensive education on all aspects of AI use in radiology. The results highlight a lack of formalized AI training in medical schools, suggesting the need for its integration into the curriculum to prepare future physicians who will increasingly rely on this technology in their practice. A collaborative focus on both the technical and ethical aspects of AI is necessary as we continue to explore this issue.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.035
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.035
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.449
Teacher spread0.394 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Medicine in Developing CountriesSame topicArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationFrench-language works237,207