MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417477971 · doi:10.64898/2025.12.16.694467

LDLR variant classification through activity-normalized prime editing screening

2025· preprint· en· W4417477971 on OpenAlexaff
Yu Tian, Vojislav Gligorovski, Nicolas Mathis, Jing Zhao, Quang Vinh Phan, Felicitas Vogd, Jayoung Ryu, Qisheng Pan, David B. Ascher, Gerald Schwank, Luca Pinello, Christopher A. Cassa, Richard I. Sherwood

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Rare Diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrime (order theory)Function (biology)Power (physics)Encoding (memory)Genome editing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Inherited variants in the LDL receptor ( LDLR ) gene are the most common cause of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), significantly increasing coronary artery disease risk. Early identification of pathogenic LDLR variants enables prompt intervention with lipid-lowering therapies; however, the majority of LDLR variants observed in the population have uncertain or absent clinical classifications, limiting the potential to improve clinical management. Methods We developed an innovative, activity-normalized prime editing screening pipeline to measure the impact of 5,184 LDLR coding variants on LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) uptake. Through pairing a genotypic outcome reporter with every prime editing guide RNA (pegRNA), we adjust phenotypic measurements to account for variable editing efficiency, extending activity normalization to prime editing for the first time at this scale. Further, we use a statistical estimation approach that leverages measurements for all missense variants at a given position to denoise the resulting scores. Results We show that prime editing-mediated reporter editing correlates with endogenous variant installation frequency, allowing activity normalization to improve imputation of LDLR variant effect. Our optimized prime editing assay identifies a broad, continuous spectrum of variant functional effects. We achieve robust separation of pathogenic vs. benign ClinVar variants and concordance between experimentally derived functional scores and LDL-C levels measured in UK Biobank participants. Further, when calibrating the strength of evidence provided by this functional screening data to align with the ACMG/AMP variant interpretation guidelines, and integrating additional sources of evidence, a majority of currently unclassified rare LDLR variants meet evidence thresholds for reclassification. We use the broad coverage of this screen to gain insight into how apolipoproteins bind to LDLR. In particular, we identify and characterize rare LDLR variants that enhance LDL-C uptake through increased interaction with apolipoprotein B. Finally, we compare prime editing-based functional scores with those derived from recent base editing and cDNA-based LDLR variant screens, showing that these approaches all show robust correlation with clinically observed LDL-C levels and computational scores, while prime editing identifies candidate splice-altering coding variants that are not modeled by cDNA screening. Conclusions Altogether, our approach demonstrates the power of prime editing to significantly improve understanding of how variants in LDLR impact function and contribute to FH.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.020
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.020
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicGenomics and Rare DiseasesFrench-language works237,207