LDLR variant classification through activity-normalized prime editing screening
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Inherited variants in the LDL receptor ( LDLR ) gene are the most common cause of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), significantly increasing coronary artery disease risk. Early identification of pathogenic LDLR variants enables prompt intervention with lipid-lowering therapies; however, the majority of LDLR variants observed in the population have uncertain or absent clinical classifications, limiting the potential to improve clinical management. Methods We developed an innovative, activity-normalized prime editing screening pipeline to measure the impact of 5,184 LDLR coding variants on LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) uptake. Through pairing a genotypic outcome reporter with every prime editing guide RNA (pegRNA), we adjust phenotypic measurements to account for variable editing efficiency, extending activity normalization to prime editing for the first time at this scale. Further, we use a statistical estimation approach that leverages measurements for all missense variants at a given position to denoise the resulting scores. Results We show that prime editing-mediated reporter editing correlates with endogenous variant installation frequency, allowing activity normalization to improve imputation of LDLR variant effect. Our optimized prime editing assay identifies a broad, continuous spectrum of variant functional effects. We achieve robust separation of pathogenic vs. benign ClinVar variants and concordance between experimentally derived functional scores and LDL-C levels measured in UK Biobank participants. Further, when calibrating the strength of evidence provided by this functional screening data to align with the ACMG/AMP variant interpretation guidelines, and integrating additional sources of evidence, a majority of currently unclassified rare LDLR variants meet evidence thresholds for reclassification. We use the broad coverage of this screen to gain insight into how apolipoproteins bind to LDLR. In particular, we identify and characterize rare LDLR variants that enhance LDL-C uptake through increased interaction with apolipoprotein B. Finally, we compare prime editing-based functional scores with those derived from recent base editing and cDNA-based LDLR variant screens, showing that these approaches all show robust correlation with clinically observed LDL-C levels and computational scores, while prime editing identifies candidate splice-altering coding variants that are not modeled by cDNA screening. Conclusions Altogether, our approach demonstrates the power of prime editing to significantly improve understanding of how variants in LDLR impact function and contribute to FH.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.020 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".